Semantic Apparatus – Why Searle’s Objection to Twin Earth is Problematic

Cited by Lee Sonogan

Philosophy of Science Week 5 Timeline | Timetoast timelines

Abstract by Paul F. Scheeler

The philosopher John Searle wrote that, “The fundamental question in the philosophy of language has always been: How does language relate to reality?” For much of history, people assumed the answer to this question was “the mind”, and the debate was then about how the mind related language to reality. Starting in the 1970s, this view was challenged by the philosopher Hilary Putnam and others who claimed that meaning is not only in the mind but also involved the environment (a view known as semantic externalism). In this paper, I will give some background to Putnam’s semantic externalism and will then defend his view against Searle’s criticism by showing that Searle’s view in fact requires externalism.

Publication: University of Dayton (Peer-Reviewed Journal)

Pub Date: 2021 Doi:

Keywords: Twin Earth, Semantic Externalism, Language Reality (Plenty more sections and references in this research article)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.