Pragmatic Apparatus – Poetry and the Possibility of Paraphrase

Cited by Lee Sonogan

Paraphrasing Poetry Prepared for Study of English Poetry

Abstract by Gregory Currie and Jacopo Frascaroli

Why is there a long-standing debate about paraphrase in poetry? Everyone agrees that paraphrase can be useful; everyone agrees that paraphrase is no substitute for the poem itself. What is there to disagree about? Perhaps this: whether paraphrase can specify everything that counts as a contribution to the meaning of a poem. ere are, we say, two ways to take the question; on one way of taking it, the answer is that para-phrase cannot. Does this entail that there is meaning mysteriously locked in a poem, meaning that cannot be represented in any way other than via the poem itself? If that were so it would have profound implications for poetry’s capacity to convey insight. We suggest reasons for thinking that the entailment does not hold. Throughout, we connect the traditional debate over paraphrase, which has largely been conducted within the elds of philosophy and literary theory, with recent empirically oriented thinking about the communicability of meaning, represented by work in pragmatics. We end with a suggestion about what is to count as belonging to meaning, and what as merely among the things that determine meaning.

Publication: International Journal of English Research (Peer-Reviewed Journal)

Pub Date: 11 Aug, 2021 Doi:

Keywords: Pragmatic Poetry, Possibility Of Paraphrase (Plenty more sections and references in this research article)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.