Carl Gauss Quotes

A quotes list created by Lee Sonogan

Carl Friedrich Gauss - Wikipedia

(CARL FRIEDRICH GAUSS) Proving that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root, he was known for the use of the Gauss Method of today. From modular arithmetic to the geometric/magnetism of astronomy, his maths calculated planetary motion to the classic physics of modern times. Going further his ‘Theorema Egregium’ details the Gaussian effects of curvature and the topology of the surface itself.

  • It is not knowledge, but the act of learning, not possession but the act of getting there, which grants the greatest enjoyment.
  • Theory attracts practice as the magnet attracts iron.
  • You know that I write slowly. This is chiefly because I am never satisfied until I have said as much as possible in a few words, and writing briefly takes far more time than writing at length.
  • You have no idea, how much poetry there is in the calculation of a table of logarithms!
  • The Infinite is only a manner of speaking.
  • The enchanting charms of this sublime science reveal only to those who have the courage to go deeply into it.
  • We must admit with humility that, while number is purely a product of our minds, space has a reality outside our minds, so that we cannot completely prescribe its properties a priori.
  • Mathematics is concerned only with the enumeration and comparison of relations.
  • I mean the word proof not in the sense of the lawyers, who set two half proofs equal to a whole one, but in the sense of a mathematician, where half proof = 0, and it is demanded for proof that every doubt becomes impossible.
  • I have a true aversion to teaching. The perennial business of a professor of mathematics is only to teach the ABC of his science; most of the few pupils who go a step further, and usually to keep the metaphor, remain in the process of gathering information, become only Halbwisser [one who has superficial knowledge of the subject], for the rarer talents do not want to have themselves educated by lecture courses, but train themselves. And with this thankless work the professor loses his precious time.
  • Does the pursuit of truth give you as much pleasure as before? Surely it is not the knowing but the learning, not the possessing but the acquiring, not the being-there but the getting there that afford the greatest satisfaction. If I have exhausted something, I leave it in order to go again into the dark. Thus is that insatiable man so strange: when he has completed a structure it is not in order to dwell in it comfortably, but to start another.
  • Sin2 φ is odious to me, even though Laplace made use of it; should it be feared that sin2 φ might become ambiguous, which would perhaps never occur, or at most very rarely when speaking of sin(φ2), well then, let us write (sin φ)2, but not sin2 φ, which by analogy should signify sin (sin φ)
  • When a philosopher says something that is true then it is trivial. When he says something that is not trivial then it is false.
  • I am coming more and more to the conviction that the necessity of our geometry cannot be demonstrated, at least neither by, nor for, the human intellect. . . Geometry should be ranked, not with arithmetic, which is purely aprioristic, but with mechanics.
  • In my opinion instruction is very purposeless for such individuals who do no want merely to collect a mass of knowledge, but are mainly interested in exercising (training) their own powers. One doesn’t need to grasp such a one by the hand and lead him to the goal, but only from time to time give him suggestions, in order that he may reach it himself in the shortest way.
  • The higher arithmetic presents us with an inexhaustible store of interesting truths – of truths, too, which are not isolated, but stand in a close internal connection, and between which, as our knowledge increases, we are continually discovering new and sometimes wholly unexpected ties.
  • Arc, amplitude, and curvature sustain a similar relation to each other as time, motion, and velocity, or as volume, mass, and density.
  • That this subject [of imaginary magnitudes] has hitherto been considered from the wrong point of view and surrounded by a mysterious obscurity, is to be attributed largely to an ill-adapted notation. If, for example, +1, -1, and the square root of -1 had been called direct, inverse and lateral units, instead of positive, negative and imaginary (or even impossible), such an obscurity would have been out of the question.
  • The problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers and of resolving the latter into their prime factors is known to be one of the most important and useful in arithmetic.
  • No contradictions will arise as long as Finite Man does not mistake the infinite for something fixed, as long as he is not led by an acquired habit of mind to regard the infinite as something bounded.

Referencing him before in other methodology, as you can see had a lot to say. Princeps mathematicorum (Latin for ‘”the foremost of mathematicians”‘) is another important figure of the 19th century. To know how to withstand such precision, more research into this guy is worth it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.