Cited by Lee Sonogan
Abstract by Nicholas Michelsen
This article argues that ‘Critical International Relations’, often counterpoised to ‘mainstream IR’, has come to function as a major theoretical category in its own right. It argues that critique involves ‘minor theorising’, defined as the practice of disturbing settled theoretical assumptions in the discipline. The article examines the role and significance of ‘minor theories’ in the context of ongoing debates about Critical IR. It argues that critique is defined by context, and is politically and ethically ambiguous. The article concludes that the scope for critique could be advanced if the terms ‘Critical IR’ and ‘Critical IR Scholar’ are dropped from scholarly parlance.
Publication: Journal of International Political Theory (Peer-Reviewed Journal)
Pub Date: Oct 6, 2020 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088220956680
Keywords: Critical IR, critique, International Relations, minor theory
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1755088220956680 (Plenty more sections and references in this research article)
https://www.patreon.com/GROOVYGORDS
https://entertainmentcultureonline.com/