Cited by Lee Sonogan
Abstract by Jack Lucas
This paper explores the structure of elite disagreement about the ideological or nonideological character of municipal politics. I propose two possible relationships between a representative’s own ideology and their beliefs about the character of municipal politics: an “ends-against-the-middle” pattern, in which ideologues on the left and right embrace an ideological vision of municipal politics, whereas moderates insist that municipal politics is not ideological; and an “asymmetric visions” pattern, in which individuals on the left endorse an ideological view of municipal politics and those on the right oppose it. I use new survey data from more than 800 mayors and councillors in Canada to assess these possible relationships. While both are supported by the data, the asymmetric visions pattern is the stronger of the two: the nonideological view of municipal politics is most firmly embraced by municipal politicians of the moderate right, while the ideological vision is most common among representatives on the left. This pattern, I argue, is in keeping with a century of municipal political history and should be incorporated into our theories of municipal elections, representation, and policy disagreement.
Publication: Urban Affairs Review (Peer-Review Journal))
Pub Date: Aug 24, 2021 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211038321
Keywords: municipal politics, ideology, political elites, municipal policy
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10780874211038321 (Plenty more sections and references in this research article)
https://www.patreon.com/GROOVYGORDS
https://entertainmentcultureonline.com/