Cited by Lee Sonogan
Abstract by Aleksandra Ćwiek,Susanne Fuchs,Christoph Draxler,Eva Liina Asu,Dan Dediu,Katri Hiovain,Shigeto Kawahara,Sofia Koutalidis,Manfred Krifka,Pärtel Lippus,Gary Lupyan,Grace E. Oh,Jing Paul,Caterina Petrone,Rachid Ridouane,Sabine Reiter,Nathalie Schümchen,Ádám Szalontai,Özlem Ünal-Logacev,Jochen Zeller,Bodo Winter &Marcus Perlman
Linguistic communication requires speakers to mutually agree on the meanings of words, but how does such a system first get off the ground? One solution is to rely on iconic gestures: visual signs whose form directly resembles or otherwise cues their meaning without any previously established correspondence. However, it is debated whether vocalizations could have played a similar role. We report the first extensive cross-cultural study investigating whether people from diverse linguistic backgrounds can understand novel vocalizations for a range of meanings. In two comprehension experiments, we tested whether vocalizations produced by English speakers could be understood by listeners from 28 languages from 12 language families. Listeners from each language were more accurate than chance at guessing the intended referent of the vocalizations for each of the meanings tested. Our findings challenge the often-cited idea that vocalizations have limited potential for iconic representation, demonstrating that in the absence of words people can use vocalizations to communicate a variety of meanings.
Publication: Scientific Reports (Peer-Reviewed Journal)
Pub Date: 12 May 2021 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89445-4
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-89445-4#citeas (Plenty more sections, figures and references in the article for free)