Ghostbusters (2016), a movie review

A movie review: By Lee Sonogan

1h56mins/Action, Comedy, Fantasy

Ghostbusters-2016-Chris-Hemsworth-Kristen-Wiig-Melissa-McCarthy.jpg

The reboot of the Ghost busters franchise. With a budget of 144 million, it was able to make 228.1 million in the box office, despite many people giving it very low reviews. The movie is described as after a ghost invasion of Manhattan, paranormal enthusiasts Erin Gilbert and Abby Yates, nuclear engineer Jillian Holtzmann, and subway worker Patty Tolan join together to stop a deadly threat.

The four main cast members all joined the movie because they themselves were fans of the original movie. This actresses are Kristen Wigg, Mellisa McCarthy, Leslie Jones and Kate Mckinnon. A number of actors from the original movie appear in this one – Bill Murray (Peter Venkman), Dan Aykroyd (Raymond Stantz), Sigourney Weaver (Dana Barrett), Annie Potts (Janine Melnitz) and Ernie Hudson (Winston Zeddmore). Bill Murray’s character Martin Heiss is a skeptic and debunker of paranormal activity. His character of Dr. Peter Venkman was a scientific charlatan who also did not believe in ghosts until he saw one personally. By contrast, all of the new Ghostbusters consider themselves serious scientists who believe in paranormal phenomena.

During the 1990s, Dan Aykroyd’s concept for a third Ghostbusters film revolved around the Ghostbusters traveling to an alternate, hellish version of New York City. Columbia Pictures balked at the proposed $150m budget. Ultimately, Ghostbusters (2016) ended up with a $144m budget, although inflation means it cost less than Aykroyd’s proposed sequel.

Some errors in the movie include:

  • Throughout the movie the shadow of the sound mike is seen above the actors heads, in the background.
  • As the trio celebrate their first supernatural encounter outside the haunted mansion, Erin (coated in slime) hugs Abby and slime sticks to Abby’s clothes. In the next shot as they continue hopping up and down there is no slime on Abby.
  • Just prior to being slimed by the ghost librarian, one of the Ghostbusters is seen eating potato chips. Whilst the sliming occurs, the chips vanish. After the sliming, the chips return.
  • Someone at the rock concert is filming the ghost with their smart phone, but the screen on the phone is the home screen instead of the scene that they would be filming.
  • Plus many more.

In conclusion,  as of July 2016 this film holds the title for ‘most disliked’ trailer ever on YouTube and with that tittle, it is hard to like this film.  Plus Chris Hemsworth plays hes worst character on film in this movie. At least the movies i have seen of him. The flim is full of mild jokes, conflicts and dull scenes. This flim deserves the low rating that i am going to give it and I do not recommend this movie to anyone. It does not live up to the former movies in the franchise and the cameo appearances from the former characters are very short and not interesting. This reboot did not work well and the only thing i can say that’s good about it is after all the scenes that are hard to watch is, the last half an hour of the movie get some what interesting. Definitely where most of the budget went.

5.4/10

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/

ghostbusters-2016-trailer.jpg

Advertisements

One thought on “Ghostbusters (2016), a movie review

  1. Pingback: List of my reviews and there ratings | Ungroovygords

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s